professional article review

The main idea of the article was to make their workers happier, have more free time, and make them feel like they can cover something that are interested in. The authors argument is that when the writers had more time and could write what they were interested in the performed better. The author supported this argument by using examples. The article had weaknesses that had to do with the content. It didn't cover and explain enough information about the overall argument. The strength this article had was that it had good word choice. The authors general conclusion is that when they provided more freedom the writers performed better at work. Overall i didn't really enjoy this article just because of how it was written. The articles main point did work with the evidence that was shown. The evidence shown did have a convincing concept and it does convince me of the point they are trying to get across. I think this ties back to what i'm doing in ecomm because it shows us that you are allowing us more freedom to make choices and overall create better content. Overall the article itself was a good article and supported it's main claims. ‘You’ve changed my perspective,’

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hobbies Project

Animation; A man, A corn-dog, And A loss.

6 shot sequence